<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stumbleupon? What about Spamupon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collective-thoughts.com/2010/01/12/stumbleupon-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collective-thoughts.com/2010/01/12/stumbleupon-spam/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:33:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Voyage Montreal</title>
		<link>http://collective-thoughts.com/2010/01/12/stumbleupon-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-43503</link>
		<dc:creator>Voyage Montreal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collective-thoughts.com/?p=706#comment-43503</guid>
		<description>I do agree, it will get worse if nothing is done about it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree, it will get worse if nothing is done about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://collective-thoughts.com/2010/01/12/stumbleupon-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-43388</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collective-thoughts.com/?p=706#comment-43388</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by lohithseo: Stumbleupon? What about Spamupon?: I am one of the few people who didn&#039;t throw a huge fit when the new version .. http://bit.ly/7k3HRA...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by lohithseo: Stumbleupon? What about Spamupon?: I am one of the few people who didn&#8217;t throw a huge fit when the new version .. <a href="http://bit.ly/7k3HRA.." >http://bit.ly/7k3HRA..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul OFlaherty</title>
		<link>http://collective-thoughts.com/2010/01/12/stumbleupon-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-43387</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul OFlaherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collective-thoughts.com/?p=706#comment-43387</guid>
		<description>Saying &quot;if you&#039;re a site owner, credit your content&quot; is all well and good if you&#039;re appealing to peoples better nature. 

But the real problem lies with the folks who do know better and just can&#039;t be bothered, or simply know that the average stumbleupon user doesn&#039;t care where an image or video came from as long as they get to watch it. Once they&#039;ve had their laugh or whatever, they&#039;ll simply click on the stumble button and won&#039;t bother clicking any credit or attribution links.

There is simply no pint on relying on the good graces of others, you have to take steps t protect your own content. Doesn&#039;t mater if it&#039;s image watermarking, preventing hotlinking etc, you&#039;ve got to do it yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying &#8220;if you&#8217;re a site owner, credit your content&#8221; is all well and good if you&#8217;re appealing to peoples better nature. </p>
<p>But the real problem lies with the folks who do know better and just can&#8217;t be bothered, or simply know that the average stumbleupon user doesn&#8217;t care where an image or video came from as long as they get to watch it. Once they&#8217;ve had their laugh or whatever, they&#8217;ll simply click on the stumble button and won&#8217;t bother clicking any credit or attribution links.</p>
<p>There is simply no pint on relying on the good graces of others, you have to take steps t protect your own content. Doesn&#8217;t mater if it&#8217;s image watermarking, preventing hotlinking etc, you&#8217;ve got to do it yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
